Blues_Promo_Politics
 
 
 
LeftITD
 
Politics Title
 

Conservatism As I See It
By Victor Casteel Friday, October 10, 2008
It honestly amazes me as to how our viewpoint changes as we immerse ourselves in different sub-cultures. From as far back as I can remember I have been an ultra right wing conservative. I have always believed in fiscal conservatism (even if the Republican Party does not), I am also a social conservative with a strong Christian worldview. About three years ago I took over a management position where 95% of my employees are African-American, and as I have worked there my eyes have been opened to a whole different viewpoint in regards to politics and life. Don’t get me wrong I am still a conservative, but I no longer drink the kool-aid. In fact if anything I have fallen more toward libertarianism more than anything else. I believe in smaller government, less taxes and less invasion into the private lives of citizens. As a Christian I have a different moral viewpoint than most, but I do not believe it is the government’s job to legislate my brand of morality. I say all of this so that as you read my columns in the upcoming weeks you have some sense of where I come from. I am not here to win friends or influence people, but instead give you a fresh perspective. The perspective of someone who thinks our government is broken and no presidential candidate is going to make the “change”, we as Americans need.


Throughout the years I have heard of voters being disenfranchised. It has been a mantra among many different communities, primarily the African-American community. This election cycle, it is my turn to shout from the rooftops. I and others who think like me are disenfranchised and have no where to turn. Obviously Obama is not someone I can vote for, it would defy every conservative principle for which I stand. On the other hand I can choose the Geritol taking, oatmeal eating, milk toast McCain. Who is just as bad if not worse than the new messiah’ Obama.  

Every conservative across America was mortified at the thought that the “maverick” would represent the Republican Party. So to pacify the masses, they trot out Bush-lite in a skirt. What they fail to realize is that most of us believe Bush is a moderate and are not happy with him. Yes there are those that are too stupid to stand up and say “Go to Hell, I will no longer play party politics.” Instead they will follow blindly down the yellow brick road, never bothering to look behind the curtain. I say it’s time to stop, to shout the conservative mantra from the rooftops. No longer can we follow a party that has walked away from the principles it espouses.  


For those of you that are confused let me define true conservatism, and not this putrid mush that the Republican Party throws at us. If you were to look up the definition of conservatism, especially in a political textbook, you would read about the adherence to tradition. This is what liberalism would have us believe, again another off base definition that belittles everything for which I stand.
Instead it is my belief that conservatism is defined by some very basic tenets. I have searched wide and far and the website Conservative-Resource.com put it in the plainest terms possible, but to be sure that everyone is able to understand, I painfully paraphrased five basic tenets.


First, that there is a natural law, good and evil, right and wrong. Don’t worry I am not trying to shove God down your throat I am just saying that there are natural laws that apply, and that our government and law should follow this basic tenet.



Second, our country is based on the constitution and bill of rights, and the government’s job is not to rewrite it, but to apply it to the era in which we live.



Third, that liberty must come before equality. No matter what your political party of preference espouses, it is impossible to be equal and free. If you redistribute my wealth to help others, while you may have done a good deed, you have submitted me to financial slavery. We are a country founded on liberty, and to enslave another to help someone else defies the very logic we were founded upon.



Fourth is the suspicion of power, more commonly defined as the mistrust in government. Government is a necessary evil, or anarchists would have the answer. However the larger our government gets the more our freedom is taken away.



Lastly is the belief in individualism. A true conservative believes in the individual, the power of a single person to define his own path, to make his own way. Barry Goldwater said it best when he stated, ” Every man, for his individual good and for the good of his society, is responsible for his own development. The choices that govern his life are choices he must make: they cannot be made by any other human being, or by a collectivity of human beings.”



I am by no means trying to indoctrinate anyone into my line of beliefs, but instead erase the myths that have been painted of conservatism. At least when a liberal speaks on his beliefs he or she is willing to stand against his party if he or she must. But conservatives fall into a weird category, they are willing to throw away everything they believe in to be able to walk into the voting booth and punch the straight ticket.



I say it is time to stop the nonsense and tell Washington to stick it. It is time we take a stand and embrace the principles on which we were founded. No matter whom you choose to vote for this election cycle, if you are a conservative you have already lost. But just because the battle is lost does not mean we have lost the war. I urge you to sound the battle cry.
Comments
By cardsbadabing @ Friday, October 10, 2008 3:38 AM
Hear hear! (or is it here here?)!!!

I find myself at nearly 2am sleepless for many reasons logging onto this site. I should probably let work go for the day and worry about it tomorrow but I logged on to see what the StL masses are saying, as I have so often throughout the last few weeks (ok, and I like Maggie's columns, too, even though I disagree w/ her latest)...

I say this because I have commented on nearly all the political and Maggie's column recently, and by far Mr. Casteel's column has rang true to my personal beliefs.

KUDOS FOR MISPELLING WHAT MOST PEOPLE THINK CONSERVATISM MEANS!. I will again, for the 3rd time, copy and paste what I have written in 2 previous articles. Nobody seems willing to comment, but perhaps that's because I chimed in at the end of comments...

"I'm a conservative but could give two shits about religion or abortion. Throw 'em both out as far as I'm concerned. I'm conservative (and make far less than $250k/year) because people who work hard to earn a living shouldn't have to pay for the lazy asses, welfare abusing, and illegal immigrants. Every body has there hands out but doesn't want to earn their stripes. D Presidents raise taxes to the middle class as well as the upper class. Look at the history books people. They crush small businesses, who make up the majority of jobs in this nation. Want more people to lose jobs or not get raises? Vote D. Solve foreign disputes by talk talk talking to our enemies? Talk to your blue in the face, they'll still attack us as soon as you go home. If that's what you want then vote D.

Obama is a great public speaker and has some decent ideas. Just don't be surprised (if he actually wins, which the media and uninformed seem to think is a shoe-in) when he goes back on his word, raises taxes for everyone to supply all the spending he's proposing. And we'll be back to war in the middle east w/in a year if we pull out of Iraq immediately. BTW, this isn't an admission that I feel he's going to win.

One more thing- the economy was already going in the tank when George W took office. Perhaps it was caused by the Clinton administration, the Enron's and Worldcom's that ran rampant and built up during the Clinton regime. He also decimated military spending and dwindled the military in general. Ever stop to think that maybe, just maybe, W inherited a mess? And when 9/11 happened there wasn't enough military to end the Iraq war soon enough? Perhaps we would have enough troops and firepower to be in Afghanistan while finishinig up the Iraq mess? I'm no George W lover, he's made mistakes. However, I get sick and tired of the D's pointing fingers soley at him when NO president, regardless of their politcal party, could have succeeded with that mess.

Let the barrage begin.... but please back it up with what Obama would REALLY do instead of pie in the sky ideas...

As far as Obama vs. Palin's experience, it's a wash. Obama has been in office for 3.5 years, yes, but nearly 2 of those have been spent on him running for the presidential nomination. Why don't we stick to Obama vs. McCain instead of Palin? She isn't running for Prez."

I should also point out that I'm a minority partner in a profitable small business at age 34. I say this because I don't make 6 figures. However, despite my rants in the quote above when I was fired up I am truly scared that if Obama is elected I will have to lay people off and postpone expansion, which is in our current business plan for March of '09, despte a suffering economy. I feel confident that other small business owners feel the same way, especially those who's net profits are less than the magical number of $250k which keeps getting thrown out there in the debates.

George W has made plenty of mistakes. I know that. However, McCain is for the small business owners who make up the majority of jobs in this nation. Obama says he's for "us" and the middle class but his plan is fundmentally flawed in that it would take far too long, even if he was elected to 2 terms, to make a difference in the vast majority of us who live in the middle class. I also think his stance on the crisis in the Middle East is flawed, because there is no easy way out. Yes, this is costing us billions of dollars each month but to move troops from Iraq to Afghanistan w/o solving the Iraqui problem will, in the long run, cost us even more.

I also would like to point out as you've probably seen in the news in the last few days that I lost a friend who lost his life in a Special Forces mission to an IED in Afganistan. I will be attending his services Friday/Saturday in Highland, IL, a little over half an hour from downtown St. Louis. Tell his family that we need to stop the fight and spending on The War.

I'm ranting here, but Geez, take the race, gender, and middle class issues out of the equation and think about what Obama's plan will REALLY mean to the 95% of us who matter, not the upper-upper class Big Company execs whose time is done.

Mr. Casteel didn't say it, but wake up people! Don't be lured into "change" when you don't understand the impact it will truly have!!!!

By Threadkiller @ Friday, October 10, 2008 7:55 AM
Boy cardsbadabing.......did you completely miss the point of this column.......you're exactly what he's refering to in this article......party loyalism isn't the answer...it's the problem.

God help us all.

By jimby @ Friday, October 10, 2008 9:08 AM
Very well said Mr. Casteel. As a libertarian I know that because of the way the two major parties and the MSM lock out any other parties Bob Barr cannot win, yet that is where my vote will go. I don't believe it is lost though. The candidates I've voted for in Missouri all received at least two percent of the vote giving them automatic ballot access eliminating the hoops they are normally forced to jump through. I have converted many friends, family and coworkers to the Libertarian party and just the act of registering will not go unnoticed. I look forward to reading your coming columns.

By cardsbadabing @ Friday, October 10, 2008 11:47 AM
Threadkiller, you have a point but I do agree with the article. My rants were directed at the Obama supporters. There are only two candidates we have a choice in voting for this election. People who read this site tend to comment on the most current articles so I chose to post my opinion here so it gets noticed.

By EING @ Friday, October 10, 2008 12:06 PM
Very good column. You described exactly what I believe in. The only disagreement I have is that you have described what many refer to as "classical liberalism", which is not the same as conservatism. The Libertarian Party probably represents your views now more than any other party. The Republicans have certainly lost their way, and are becoming more progressive. Obama is a collectivist (a nicer way of saying socialist), so there's no way I could vote for him, but I don't think the Repubs have any interest in protecting individual freedom and limitied government.

By TaserProof @ Friday, October 10, 2008 3:32 PM
two problems

how different is your christian moral view point than that of the average person? epspecially saying right vs wrong, good vs evil. dont most of us know right vs wrong(or at least when it comes to morals) and good vs evil. i would hope the average want evil to loose that battle.

2 what are you saying about america being founded on freedome. maybe freedom to think but slaves built this country. and we killed countless natives so we could have our way. we even marched them across the country to new places and act like letting them having casinos makes up for it. i agree we cant be free and equal but we can try, or at least act like we are.

By sjbh2 @ Friday, October 10, 2008 9:26 PM
One of the first political articles I've read on any site in a while that doesn't spout of all sorts of talking points and partisan bs. You lay it out there without trying to influence anyone or demean anyone. I'm so sick of all of these celebrities who are so out of touch with reality thinking that they matter so much that whoever they vote for is obviosly the best choice for everone else. If I made $20 million to read a script for a few months, I might agree with them, but I don't, so they need to shut the fuck up. Very well written piece, look forward to reading more of your work.

By Imaspy @ Sunday, October 12, 2008 11:12 PM
I disagree with Goldwater conservatives but I can live with them and debate them because I know what the fuck they want. I think you are dillusional and ignore history and reality and usually let religion creep into your politics, but I know where you stand and can resprect it. It is a vital element in the checks and balances necessary to make this a great country. But as you so refreshingly point out, the current republican party is a far cry from a true conservative party. What I deem them is "corporatists". It's the only common thread in the party. Who benefits consistently under this administration besides large multinational corporations? Everything is designed to benefit them. So bring back the Goldwater conservatives and we can debate if legalizing pot is "good" or "bad". (Your first tennant is so completely subjective that I find it almost worthless but I understand why it's thrown out there. In extremes it can have some use but really doesn't seperate you from any other group of people in the world. Everyone believes they are right the other person is wrong.) I look forward to your future articles and would challenge you with this. Wouldn't a true "small governenment" conservative want to legalize drugs and abortion as long as you didn't hurt another person? Yes, you could argue that abortion hurts a person and it is "wrong". On a personal level I might agree, but isn't that using your own moral code in government? Interesting stuff indeed.

You must be logged in to post a comment. You can login here